Видео

Great explanation

How do you reduce bleed from drum cymbals in a live performance?

Great lesson, much appreciated

Great explanation ! Thanks bro !

Nice job)) how can i contact you ? I usually record my drums on 1 mic as multitrack but i never felt happy with the mixing and mastering on my drums sound . the engineers usually put another snare and kick etc . but i really want the sound of my drum recording to sound better and heavier without replacing anything

I'm a middle-out guy, processing subgroups first, then fixing issues below and sweetening above. I suppose this falls under "hybrid"...?

a Mac mouse doesn't have a left and right just one click. so should I just use a pc mouse

which gate did you use??

Before the reveal, I hear distortion on the low end on an and d. On AirPod

I have used the CLA Nx Stereo for a couple of years on my Sennheiser HD 400 Pro and love it! :)

Just bought this this morning! Looking forward to playing around with it! Also great to Discover your channel mate :D

This is crraaazzy good stuff!!

A - D - X are oversampled IMO. This is my first answer listening to from my tv. I turn on the monitors and I realised the opposite situation! Great video!

I try to do bottom up as much as I CAN, but I certainly do not exclude the idea of top down. Most of the times I see myself doing BOTH, and at the end of the day, if you reached the sound you wanted you got the job done. You cant listen to a track and guess if it was top down or bottom up mixed (that doesn't even make sense). So everything is valid to achieve the desired sound.

Rip I got 0/3

Nice bro 👍

the short example was very clear!!!...thanks for the video dude!

Relative Listening.

Bruh , I chose A, D, X 😭

Bcy. But I can only BARELY tell in the cymbals

Yes

The best video I've seen on this "topic."

The oversampled ones sound so much more open. Like there’s room to put your feet up in the mix and stretch out. A, D and X sound more cluttered. Not bad but I definitely prefer B C and Y. Great tests!

Yes but inturn more 'Perceived' low end is coming thru. Pretty sure Pro's understand this

Big thanks for this video! It was pretty easy to hear the oversampled ones (B, C, Y), However, since I have been hoarding the "analog modeling" plugins recently, this is a very good reminder about the actual sound quality that can be achieved. Thank you 🙏

I couldn't pay attention because I was listening to the riff in The background

Thanks for sharing!

I like to do mid straight mixing, having a template then going from there lol jk

BCY, totally audiolble on 10$ headphones. More oversampling - less high freq for me in this test. But high freq almost always anotal, aliasing atonal - no problem here at all

Hello Daniel! I hope you're well ! Thanks for the great informations about this wonderful new Waves plugin "Spice Rider". Sorry to go a bit out of context !... Please ! could you tell me with which Virtual instrements, you programmed your " Drums and your BASS " ?... because they Sound Really Great !!! 👌👌👌👍 Thanks again and Good Continuation !!!..

B/C/Y

You can check out Waves SpaceRIDER here: bit.ly/3OjV73N

Thanks, you didn t told that those clip plugins sound very good, might be better than Fab filter. It would be nice to buy them apart for the standard track plugins as well, if possible

i’m still waiting for Eddy Grant to say “heeeey”

Power bottom mixer here

I've only just started playing around with home studio production, but I've done a little bit of live mixing and some studio and location recording in the past. The only time I would imagine myself doing a strictly top-down mix is if it's a live recording with a limited number of tracks and you want your mix to sound like the performance. Otherwise, I don't see the point, as if you spend a lot of time on a mix, then work your way down, by the time you've played with the tracks the top-level mix will sound different and you'll have to spend time re-doing it. I'd do a very basic top-level mix first, to see where everything sits and plan what I'm going to do to the tracks, but the real mix would come at the end. Maybe that's inefficient, but I'm still working this stuff out. Good video!

I tried the cla nx one. Works great for mixing on headphones but it seems to take a toll on my CPU which gives me time outs.

Bottom up is more logical and makes more sense. I don t see anyone starting a house from the roof down.

can't find my headsett on the. Sennheiser hd 400 pro and Sennheiser 200. and Sennheiser 280 pro

Very informative, great doco!

It does the same as Sonarworks but for 3 times the money.

Check it out here: waves.alzt.net/splmixing

Is this track uploaded somewhere.... i like it a lot!!!!!

the hp filter sounds higher than 60hz to me, what you you think?

Thank You, Daniel, Thank You SPL (Mixing)!! Really useful video.

I grabbed NX as a way to test out the EQ correction for my Sony 7506 cans. On one hand, I absolutely hate working on headphones but figured it time to join the rest of the world or at least have the option to reference them as an option. One feature that really irritates me is the head tracking. Why is that necessary? It drive me nuts having it on so I'm thankful to be able to turn it off. What is the actual benefit to head tracking? It seems to me it's just a technical gimmick that ultimately does nothing to help or speed up any task. What am I missing?

Sorry, but after watching your video twice I still don't get what you mean. How are we supposed to reduce boominess in the bass then?

How do you build the tube traps ? Are they more effective than super chunks ?

Hi and Thanks for your helpful video! one question that remains is why you pulled the close attack kick mic track more forward, like two amplitudes, before the in-mic and the third kick mic. could you please explain? thanks :)